State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
Because the reports filed by Dr. Kang should have been considered signed, the court of appeals erred below. Dr. Kang’s reports could constitute some evidence upon which the commission could base its order. However, we agree with the magistrate below that the cause should be returned to the commission to determine the voluntariness of claimant’s retirement.
The appellate court based its decision on several cases that dealt with reports that were completely unsigned. In State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm. (1983), 13 Ohio App.3d 178, 179, 13 OBR 213, 214, 468 N.E.2d 777, 778, the report at issue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Smith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. YanceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Ohio Ex Rel. Rouan v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, 06ap-909 (6-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007