Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mominee v. Scherbarth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1986No. Nos. 85-688 and 85-1039Published

1ConcurrenceCelebrezze, C.J.

The legal analysis of the constitutionality of R.C. 2305.11(B), as applied to minors, is compellingly presented in Justice Sweeney’s majority opinion. As Justice Sweeney has demonstrated, the statutory four-year time bar, when applied to minors injured by medical malpractice, does not bear a real and substantial relation to the legislative goal of providing access to health care for the citizens of this state. It is also manifest that this time bar is an unreasonable and arbitrary restriction on minors’ access to our courts. The crux of this legal *279analysis was eloquently stated in Strahler v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Strahler v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. State v. HalczyszakOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hedrick v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API