Legal Opinion

Barnet v. National Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1879No. 856PublishedCited by 124 opinions

Error to tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Southern District of Obio. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice S wayne

delivered the opinion of the court.

The bank brought this suit upon a bill of exchange, dated Nov. 18, 1873, for $4,000, drawn by David Barnet upon Barnets & Whiteside, in favor of Robert Marshall, and payable ninety days from date, at the Second National Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio. It was accepted by the drawees, indorsed by the payee, and discounted by the Muncie National Bank of Indiana. Before the maturity of the bill the acceptors made an assignment to David Barnet and Isaac E. Craig, the plaintiffs in - error. The suit was commenced in the Court of Common Pleas of Preble…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Tucker v. AlexandroffSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. M. Nahas & Co., Inc. v. First National Bank of Hot SpringsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API