Legal Opinion
Fine v. Semet
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 11, 1983No. Nos. 81-5246, 81-5312PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
In this suit arising from the breakup of a law firm, plaintiff trustees sought a declaration of their legal obligation to comply with defendant’s demand for an immediate, lump sum payment of his accrued benefits in the firm’s pension and profit sharing plans. The district court held that the plaintiffs could properly deny the demand. Fine v. Semet, 514 F.Supp. 34 (S.D.Fla. 1981). We affirm.
*1093The plaintiffs, stockholders in the law firm of Fine, Jacobson, Klein, Colan & Simon, P.A., formerly known as Fine, Jacobson, Block, Goldberg & Semet, P.A. (“the firm”), are trustees of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Rita Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross v. The State of Mississippi, Defendants-Appellants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Ralph Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc. And Revised Pension Plan of Michael Schiavone& Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Horace Eugene Bayles v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- George Wolfe v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.