Ralph Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc. And Revised Pension Plan of Michael Schiavone& Sons, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
Appellee Michael Schiavone and Sons, Inc. (“Schiavone”) had a pension plan for the benefit of its employees, one of whom was appellant Ralph Pompano. When Pompano reached retirement age (65) after 36 years as an employee of Schiavone, he sought a single lump sum payment which, under Article IV § 2 of the plan, was one of the optional modes of settlement a participant could elect “[i]n lieu of the normal pension to which he would otherwise be entitled.” The plan provided that the lump sum option was available only with the “prior approval of the [Pension] Committee.”
Whe…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harold West, Trustees of the Southern Labor Union Welfare Fund and Pension Fund v. James ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
3Cited by89 opinions
- Faber v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan And Irap LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Connie Edmonson v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.