Legal Opinion
Bedard v. Cunneen
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 17, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The petition alleged these facts: The town of Brooklyn, in the year 1928, and for many years prior thereto, has held an annual town meeting on the first Monday of October, at each of which it has elected six grand jurors in accordance with the statute. The powers of grand jurors in the town are not vested in any other prosecuting officer or officers. Neither at the annual meeting held on the first Monday of October, 1928, nor at any subsequent time, has the town held a meeting changing the number of grand jurors or prescribing the mode in which they should be voted for. On the first Monday of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- South School District v. BlakesleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1839
- Ryan v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Bartlett v. KinsleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
- Baldwin v. Town of North BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- Bull v. Town of WarrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BashuraConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
- Hoblitzelle v. FrechetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Tomes v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Welles v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Adley Express Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.