Jones v. Bank of Powder Springs
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
The bank sued on a note for $330. The defendants by their sworn plea denied in general terms the execution of the instrument sued on, and set up that the only note which they had signed and delivered to plaintiff was one in the sum of $33, on which they received that amount. The note sued on (which was admitted in evidence without objection), by both its figures and writing, called for $330. There is nothing in the record to indicate that it showed any evidence of having been altered. The officials of the bank both testified that it was taken for $330 and represented a loan in that sum…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. RandolphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Mallary Bros. & Co. v. MoonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Bank of Norwood v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Jewell v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Higdon v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atlanta Laundries Inc. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Trice v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Willis v. Seiberling Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Winn v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Gardner v. FleetwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.