Legal Opinion

Willis v. Seiberling Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 21, 1931No. 21326PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1.„ “Under a denial of the allegations in the plaintiff’s declaration, no other defense is admissible except such as disproves the plaintiff’s cause of action; all other matters in satisfaction or avoidance must be specially pleaded.” Civil Code (1910), § 5636.

2. In a suit against a partnership and its members upon a check purporting to have been executed by one of the members in behalf of the partnership, an answer by one of the members which iirst contained a mere general denial of indebtedness, but which was amended so as to allege that the check was executed by the other member after the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rice v. Ware & HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Dixie Manufacturing Co. v. RicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Anderson v. BlairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Purcell v. Armour Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Higdon v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Carithers v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Ray v. MarettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Brandt v. EckmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Crosman v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API