Legal Opinion

Fry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2008No. 28496PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Presiding Judge.

Appellant David Wayne Fry (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and Judgment brought pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 Movant was convicted by a jury of robbery in the first degree, a violation of section 569.020; kidnapping, a violation of section 565.110; two counts of assault in the second degree, violations of section 565.060; and burglary in the first degree, a violation of section 569.160. 2 Following an evidentiary hearing on Movant’s Rule 29.15 motion, the motion court denied relief.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Byrd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Polk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Mason v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Morgan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Landa v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API