Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2010No. SD 30140PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Presiding Judge.

David Morgan (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial following an eviden- tiary hearing of his postconvietion motion filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 In his sole point on appeal, Movant maintains he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to establish that a confidential informant working for the Southeast Missouri Drug Task Force, .Michael Bane (“Mr. Bane”), did not have his shoes, socks and bandana removed pri- or to his controller, Missouri Highway Patrol Sergeant Mark McClendon (“Sergeant McClendon”), sending Mr.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. C_ E_ J v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mercer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Dominique A. Lindsey v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API