Morgan v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Presiding Judge.
David Morgan (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial following an eviden- tiary hearing of his postconvietion motion filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 In his sole point on appeal, Movant maintains he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to establish that a confidential informant working for the Southeast Missouri Drug Task Force, .Michael Bane (“Mr. Bane”), did not have his shoes, socks and bandana removed pri- or to his controller, Missouri Highway Patrol Sergeant Mark McClendon (“Sergeant McClendon”), sending Mr.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- C_ E_ J v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mercer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dominique A. Lindsey v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021