Mason v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAngela T. Quigless, J.
Keith Mason ("Movant") appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.151 amended motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant asserts two points on appeal, arguing the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach the victim with a prior inconsistent statement, and trial counsel was ineffective for convincing Movant he did not have the right to testify at trial. We affirm the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
Movant was charged with one count of first-degree statutory rape, one count of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Bucklew v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Edward L. Hoeber v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Hurst v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adrian R. Washington v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Edward Walker, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- Lamar McVay v. Gregory HancockDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026