Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Hart
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 29, 1989No. C4-88-2187PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent, David A. Hart, is currently suspended from the practice of law in the State of Minnesota. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (hereinafter “Director”) filed a petition for further disciplinary action against respondent. Respondent did not answer the petition; therefore, we accepted the allegations in the petition as admitted pursuant to Rule 13(b), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Moreover, respondent appeared at oral argument and verbally acknowledged the truth of the allegations.
The only issue is the appropriate discipline we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Matter of Discipline of SimonsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Matter of Discipline of WarehamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against KarlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Petition for Discipl. Act. Against WeemsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.