Genentech, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim GmbH
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Genentech, Inc. (“Genen-teeh”), alleges that the defendants, Boehringer Mannheim GmbH and Boehringer Mannheim Corp. (collectively, “BM”), infringed five patents involving its tissue plasminogen activator (“t-PA”) product. This memorandum and order addresses the issues of claims construction raised in a hearing held on June 17-18, 1997, and July 23, 1997, regarding three of Genentech’s patents: United States Patent Nos. 4,432,832 (“the ’832 patent”); 5,034,225 (“the ’225 patent”); and 4,511,502 (“the ’502 patent”). See…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. An Article of Drug Consisting of 4,680 Pails, More or Less, Each Pail Containing 60 Packets, Etc., Pfizer, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Microbix Biosystems, Inc. v. Biowhittaker, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Ductmate Industries, Inc. v. Famous Supply Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Genentech, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim GmbHDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Boler Co. v. Neway Anchorlok, International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.