Legal Opinion

Boler Co. v. Neway Anchorlok, International, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 14, 2000No. 5:99CV1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GWIN, District Judge.

In this case, Plaintiff Boler Company claims Defendant Neway Anchorlok International, Inc. infringed its rights in U.S.Patent No. 5,366,237 (“the ’237 patent”). Pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996), the Court now construes Plaintiff Boler Company’s ’237 patent.

I.Background

This case involves a popular suspension system used on heavy duty truck trailers known generally in the industry as “trailing arm suspensions” or “trailing beam suspensions.” The ’237 patent teaches improvements to air…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API