Legal Opinion
Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 2003No. 01-56447PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge.
Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. (“Digital Images”) brought this private antitrust action, with supplemental state law claims, against Tektronix Inc. (“Tektronix”) and Avid Technology, Inc. (“Avid”), collectively (“defendants”). Pursuant to defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the district court dismissed Digital Images’ antitrust and promissory estoppel claims, as well as some of its fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims. The court concluded that Digital Images lacked “anti-trust standing” in that the injury alleged did not qualify as “antitrust injury.” The district…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oestreicher v. Alienware Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Anunziato v. eMachines, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Tech., Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.