Legal Opinion
Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 28, 2006No. C-05-04826 RMWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING VERISIGN’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
WHYTE, District Judge.
On November 28, 2005 the Coalition For ICANN Transparency, Inc. (“CFIT”) sued VeriSign, Inc. (‘VeriSign”) and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”) (collectively “defendants”) for antitrust violations, unfair competition, cybersquatting, and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. CFIT filed a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). On November 30, 2005 this court denied CFIT’s motion. The court noted that it…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Wellpoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. BecerraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021