Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Uncle Bart's, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2000No. 970261PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*530HOWE, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{1 Plaintiffs Michael L. Adkins and Roberta A. Adkins appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court after the court reduced the amount of damages awarded them by a jury in accordance with the Utah Dramshop Act, Utah Code Ann. § 82A-14-101 (1994). Defendants Uncle Bart's, Inc., d/b/a Uncle Bart's Club, and Charley's Club, Inc., cross-appeal contending that plaintiffs have no cause of action against them under the Dramshop Act.

BACKGROUND

12 On March 1, 1994, seventeen-year-old Sean Adkins was one of seven teenage boys riding in a seven-passenger station wagon…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Howlett v. DoglioIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Campbell v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Fire Ins Exchange v. OltmannsUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Utah Stream Access Coal. v. Orange St. Dev.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API