Legal Opinion

Howlett v. Doglio

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1949No. 30805. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This appeal presents for decision the construction of section 14 of the Liquor Control Act, commonly known and herein referred to as the Dram Shop Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, chap. 43, par. 135,) which, so far as relevant, provides, “Every husband, wife, child, parent, guardian, employer or other person, who shall be injured, in person or property, or means of support, by any intoxicated person, or in consequence of the intoxication, habitual or otherwise, of any person, shall have a right of action in his or her own name, severally or jointly, against any person or persons who shall, by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wilcox v. BierdIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Dukeman v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hackett v. SmelsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Williams v. ManchesterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Maki v. FrelkIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API