Legal Opinion

Walston v. Boeing Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 29, 2013No. 42543-2-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.

¶1 — The Boeing Company appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment under RCW 51.04.010 and RCW 51.24.020, which provide that workers’ compensation is the exclusive remedy for injured employees subject to the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW, absent an employer’s deliberate intention to cause such injury. Because Boeing met its burden to show that no disputed material facts exist here, the burden shifted to Walston to raise a material factual dispute about whether Boeing had actual knowledge that the complained-of asbestos exposure was certain to cause…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Vallandigham v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Vallandigham v. CLOVER PARK SCHOOL DIST.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Birklid v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Birklid v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walston v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. ReikowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Michelbrink v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Casey v. Alcoa CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  5. First-citizens Bank & Trust Co, V Bruce A & Sandra J. ReikowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API