Legal Opinion

Casey v. Alcoa Corporation

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 16, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01358Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 CLINTON E. CASEY, 8 Plaintiff, C18-1358 TSZ 9 v. ORDER 10 ALCOA CORPORATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Alcoa’s1 Motion for 13 Summary Judgment, docket no. 75. Having reviewed all papers filed in support of and in 14 opposition to the motion, the Court enters the following order. 15 Background 16 Plaintiff Clinton E. Casey worked at Alcoa Wenatchee Works, an aluminum 17 manufacturing facility from 1973 until his retirement in 2005. Olson Decl., docket 18 no. 85,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Vallandigham v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Birklid v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API