Legal Opinion

Birklid v. Boeing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1995No. 62530-1PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

While Washington law has recognized that industrial insurance is the exclusive remedy of the employee injured in the course of employment and barred lawsuits by employees against employers, by its enactment of the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), the Legislature also established an exception to the rule of exclusivity for circumstances in which an employer deliberately injures an employee. In those circumstances, an employee retains the right to sue the employer.

In a case involving a conflict between the exclusivity provision of Washington’s Industrial Insurance Act, RCW 51.04.010, and the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Vallandigham v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Vallandigham v. CLOVER PARK SCHOOL DIST.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Birklid v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API