Legal Opinion

Summers v. Summers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1928No. 6 Div. 961PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Independent of the influence of any statute affecting the subject, the authorities are overwhelmingly to the effect (1) that the mere custody of a life insurance policy by the beneficiary named therein, though that beneficiary alsovoluntarily pay the dues or assessments thereon, will not deprive the insured of his expressly given power to change the beneficiary in accordance with the rules of the association; and (2) that, where the original beneficiary is named pursuant to an agreement, express or implied, that he shall be so named, upon some valid consideration moving from him, he acquires…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Hoeft v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Slaughter v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. West End Sav. Bank v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Taylor v. Southern Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. FeltmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API