Legal Opinion

Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1929No. 1 Div. 572PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was by beneficiary in an insurance policy against the Prudential Insurance Company.

And the original defendant, the Prudential Insurance Company, by interpleader, brought in rival claimants for the proceeds of that life insurance contract. Marsh v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 200 Ala. 438, 76 So. 370; Fourth Nat’l Bank v. Woolfolk (Ala. Sup.) 125 So. 217. And, the funds being paid into court, upon motion, the Merchants’ National Bank, as the executor of the will of assured, claimed the money, and was substituted as defendant. It thereupon propounded its claim to the money deposited in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Cohen v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Hanrick v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Voyager Life Ins. Co., Inc. v. WhitsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc. v. SmallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. FabArc Steel Supply, Inc. v. COMPOSITE CONSTR. SYSTEMS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Lemond Const. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API