Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Independent School District No. 194
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 2, 1993No. C7-92-1510PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellants Larry Byrd, James Hoiness, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) argue the trial court erred in determining the IBEW lacked standing to pursue its claims. Appellants also argue Independent School District No. 194 violated the bid specifications, causing a material variance. In addition, they challenge the trial court’s determination that their claims are barred by the doctrine of laches. Respondent Independent School District 194 (ISD 194) contends the court erred in determining appellants Byrd and Hoiness have standing as taxpayers. We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc. v. Minnesota State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Builders Ass'n v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Imperial Premium Finance, Inc. v. GK Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. KnutsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.