Comstock v. Fiorella
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.
—Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant. The trial court found Code of Civil Procedure, section 580b, prevented its rendering a deficiency judgment.
The evidence reflects assets of a partnership, in which plaintiff and defendant were the sole members, consisted of a bank account, real property, furniture and fixtures, gardening equipment and rents due from tenants occupying the real property. A section of the preamble to the written partnership dissolution agreement provided, “. . . Whereas, the parties have agreed to terminate the partnership and to distribute…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Hill v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Land v. LandUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Sannerud v. First National Bank of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Shepherd v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Estate of Skaggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.