Legal Opinion

Ames v. Board of Retirement

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1983No. Civ. 6990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*908Opinion

ZENOVICH, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County denying a writ of mandate that would have required respondent, Board of Retirement of Tulare County, to classify appellant, a correctional officer II in the sheriff’s office, as a “safety member” in the Tulare County Employees Retirement Association. The trial court found that appellant failed to show that his principal duties consisted of “active law enforcement” as defined in Government Code section 31469.3, subdivision (b).

Facts1

Appellant was initially employed by the County of Tulare in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Bekiaris v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Griggs v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Huntington Beach v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Los Angeles County Safety Police Ass'n v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Glover v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Schaeffer v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API