Legal Opinion

Mark A. Criss v. The City of Kent Rick Haury, Officer, Kent City Police Department

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1988No. 88-3314PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Mark A. Criss, appeals from the decision of the District Court granting summary judgment for the defendants, The City of Kent, Ohio and Officer Rick Haury, in plaintiff’s section 1983 suit and remanding plaintiff’s pendent state law claims. Plaintiff asserts that the District Court erred, first, by restricting plaintiff’s discovery pending resolution of the threshold immunity issue; second, by concluding that no material factual dispute concerning probable cause precludes summary judgment; and third, by failing to find further investigation to be a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Steven v. Summers v. State of Utah Salt Lake Commissioners "John Does 1-5", and Salt Lake City Corporation Officer James E. FaraoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted FallsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API