Shaffer v. Armer
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOTT, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of a patent. The patent claims a method of joining drill pipe sections to tool joint members by means of a weld laid in a bevel, or counter-bore, cut in the shoulder of a tool joint. The equipment referred to is used in oil well drilling operations. Drill pipe *614is customarily manufactured in thirty foot lengths, the most common being about four and one-half inches in diameter. The tool joint is designed to serve as a coupling for drill pipe sections, which, when assembled, produce a “drill-string” or “drill-stem” of indefinite length…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mayrath v. Hutchinson Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1950