Legal Opinion

Mayrath v. Hutchinson Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 29, 1950No. KC-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOTT, Chief Judge.

This is an action for infringement of a patent. The patent claims an improved, portable, fluent material loader, consisting of a screw conveyor and supporting and operating structure therefor, whereby material, such as grains, may be removed from freight cars, piles, and the like, to storage containers, trucks, or cars. Plaintiff, relying upon five claims of the patent, 'prays for a permanent injunction prohibiting the making, sale or use by defendants of a device alleged to infringe, for an accounting of profits and damages, and for costs and attorney’s fees. The alleged…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API