Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Aldridge
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 2, 1995No. 91 Civ. 2649PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge:
The defendant and plaintiff on the counterclaim, Tom Rupert Aldridge, an Underwriter at Lloyd’s London, on behalf of himself and all those other Lloyd’s Underwriters subscribing to Insurance Policy No. 790/004A89005 (“Lloyd’s”), has moved for a determination of this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction in this matter. For the reasons given below, the Court dismisses this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The plaintiff, Chase Manhattan Bank (“Chase”), commenced this action on April 17, 1991 against “Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Advani Enterprises, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds and Syndicate 735 at Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Hoepker v. KrugerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Humm v. Lombard World Trade, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. WallisColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Trustees of Boston University v. ASM Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.