Legal Opinion
Humm v. Lombard World Trade, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1996No. 94 Civ. 3470(AGS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION & ORDER
SCHWARTZ, District Judge:
This action is before the Court on defendant Lombard & Co., Inc.’s (formerly known as Lombard World Trade, Inc.) (“Lombard”) motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to join indispensable parties and lack of standing. In addition, third party defendant Lowndes Lambert Cargo Ltd. moves to dismiss Lombard’s claim against it for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2).
BACKGROUND
On or about November 21, 1988, Lombard became insured under a policy of marine cargo…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Advani Enterprises, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds and Syndicate 735 at Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Thigpen v. Cheminova, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
- E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Accident & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tennessee Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Penguin Random House, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.