Legal Opinion
Hoepker v. Kruger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 3, 2002No. 00 CIV. 6619(AKH)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HELLERSTEIN, District Judge.
This right of privacy case is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, on the ground that plaintiff Dabney has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and on the ground that plaintiff has not alleged a sufficient jurisdictional amount to support diversity jurisdiction. Defendants have also moved for an order awarding costs and fees against plaintiffs for an earlier stage of the proceedings. For the reasons discussed below, I grant defendants’ motion dismissing the Amended Complaint, and deny their…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Troll Company v. Uneeda Doll Company, Docket No. 05-6487-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Kavanagh v. ZwillingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Burck v. Mars, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Jackson v. OdenatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Lohan v. PerezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.