Legal Opinion

In Re Zicam Cold Remedy Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 3, 2011No. 2:09-po-02096PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FREDERICK J. MARTONE, District Judge.

We have before , us defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of general causation (doc. 1374), plaintiffs’ response (doc. 1412), and defendants’ reply (doc. 1426). 1

I. MDL Background

Plaintiffs allege that their use of Zicam Cold Remedy Intranasal Gel Spray or Swabs caused them to lose their sense of smell. For a description of the Zicam intranasal products, see our Order on Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Causation Experts (“Daubert Order”) at 2-3 (doc. 1360).

Defendants moved to exclude the opinions of four of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yates v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  2. In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
  3. Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API