In Re Zicam Cold Remedy Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FREDERICK J. MARTONE, District Judge.
We have before , us defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of general causation (doc. 1374), plaintiffs’ response (doc. 1412), and defendants’ reply (doc. 1426). 1
I. MDL Background
Plaintiffs allege that their use of Zicam Cold Remedy Intranasal Gel Spray or Swabs caused them to lose their sense of smell. For a description of the Zicam intranasal products, see our Order on Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Causation Experts (“Daubert Order”) at 2-3 (doc. 1360).
Defendants moved to exclude the opinions of four of plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yates v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
- Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019