Legal Opinion

In re Curley

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1946No. 5204PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims (Nos. 1 to 4, inclusive) in appellants’ application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to an improved ventilator or blower for use in underground mines, and particularly in “gaseous mines.”

*750Except as hereinafter nbted, claims 2 and 3 are illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

2. In a ventilator, the combination with a ventilator housing, of an electric motor positioned within sai^| housing and comprising…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robins v. WettlauferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. Kingsland, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Moss v. Patterson-Ballagh Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
  4. Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. KingslandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
  5. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API