Legal Opinion
Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. Kingsland, Commissioner of Patents
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 12, 1949No. 9941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.
The question here is whether, after the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals reverses a rejection of a patent application, the Patent Office may still deny the applica tion on the basis of an additional reference to the prior art not previously cited.
The Patent Office rejected all claims of appellant’s application. Upon appeal the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals reversed the rejection as to two of the claims. Application of Curley, 34 C.C.P.A., Patents, 749, 158 F.2d 300. Upon return of the case to the Patent Office those claims whose rejection, had been affirmed by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Densmore v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of Robert R. CitronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- John F. Cody v. Aktiebolaget FlymoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Application of Milton E. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Milton E. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.