State v. Mullican
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
The question on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the aggravating factors. We have held that a statement by the prosecuting attorney is not sufficient standing alone to find an aggravating factor. State v. Thompson, 309 N.C. 421, 307 S.E.2d 156 (1983). If opposing counsel stipulates to a statement it may be used to support the finding of an aggravating factor. State v. Swimm, 316 N.C. 24, 340 S.E.2d 65 (1986).
The defendant contends that the only evidence to support the finding of the aggravating factors in this case was the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SwimmSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. ToomerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. CanadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. HurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. SammartinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.