Legal Opinion

State v. Mullican

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 14, 1991No. 379A89PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The question on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the aggravating factors. We have held that a statement by the prosecuting attorney is not sufficient standing alone to find an aggravating factor. State v. Thompson, 309 N.C. 421, 307 S.E.2d 156 (1983). If opposing counsel stipulates to a statement it may be used to support the finding of an aggravating factor. State v. Swimm, 316 N.C. 24, 340 S.E.2d 65 (1986).

The defendant contends that the only evidence to support the finding of the aggravating factors in this case was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. SwimmSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. ToomerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. CanadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. HurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. SammartinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API