Legal Opinion

McGehee v. . McGehee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 12, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

At the close of the evidence, on the trial of this cause, had at the December Term, 1924, it was agreed between counsel for plaintiff and defendants that the only question then for decision was whether or not the principle of equitable compensation, as sometimes engrafted on the primary doctrine of election, was applicable to the facts of the instant case. The trial .court was of the opinion that it was and rendered judgment accordingly. This was reversed on plaintiff’s appeal, but without any direction as to what judgment should be entered. McGehee v. McGehee, 189 N. C., 558. Hence, when the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. NorthupSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Stacy v. Thrasher Ex Rel. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Johnson v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. University v. . BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. McGehee v. . McGeheeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Lichtenfels v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Allen v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. McGehee v. McGeheeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  5. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API