Legal Opinion

McGehee v. . McGehee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1925PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the facts as above: It is conceded that the will of Henry W. McGehee is void in South Carolina and valid in North Carolina, Virginia and Maryland. The case pivots on whether the plaintiff is entitled to claim under, or required to take against, her husband’s will in North Carolina. In other words, do the facts, properly appearing of record, call for the application of the doctrine of equitable election as between the legacy and a distributive share of the personal property? We think not.

“Election,” in the sense it is used in courts of equity, says Judge Story, “is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission v. DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Lea v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
  3. Sigmon v. . HawnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Melchor v. . BurgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
  5. Robbins v. . WindlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Hodges v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Benton v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Lamb v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API