Legal Opinion
De Martini v. Wheatley
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 23, 1932No. Docket No. 4667PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury for damages sustained by plaintiff resulting from the collision of two automobiles.
The complaint and its amendment contains two counts, in one of which it was alleged that plaintiff was riding* as a passenger for hire in the automobile driven by appellant Belle Cardoza, at the time of the collision; and in the other it is alleged that plaintiff was riding as a guest therein.
It appears from the evidence that on June 20,' 1931, respondent was riding in an automobile operated by Belle Cardoza,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Neher v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- King v. SchumacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Sweet v. SagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938