Curtis v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
McLELLAN, District Judge.
Annexed to the libel, which alleges a collision between the libellant’s yacht and the respondent’s steamship, is a set of interrogatories, to three of which (Nos. 5, 7 and 8) the respondent excepts. The libellant asks that the respondent be required to answer them.
The 5th interrogatory reads: “If your answer to the preceding interrogatory (which preceding interrogatory asks whether there was a collision) is in the affirmative, please state the point at which such collision occurred, giving either latitude and longitude or distance and bearing from some recognized…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Mammoth Oil Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1925
- Prince Line, Ltd. v. Mayer & Lage, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- The Henry S. GroveDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
- MacLeod & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
- The Forest T. CrosbyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950