Legal Opinion

Curtis v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 1, 1939No. 792PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McLELLAN, District Judge.

Annexed to the libel, which alleges a collision between the libellant’s yacht and the respondent’s steamship, is a set of interrogatories, to three of which (Nos. 5, 7 and 8) the respondent excepts. The libellant asks that the respondent be required to answer them.

The 5th interrogatory reads: “If your answer to the preceding interrogatory (which preceding interrogatory asks whether there was a collision) is in the affirmative, please state the point at which such collision occurred, giving either latitude and longitude or distance and bearing from some recognized…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Mammoth Oil Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1925
  2. Prince Line, Ltd. v. Mayer & Lage, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  3. The Henry S. GroveDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
  4. MacLeod & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
  5. The Forest T. CrosbyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API