Legal Opinion
The Forest T. Crosby
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 10, 1929No. 12874PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The libelant excepts to interrogatories 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,12, 13, and 14 propounded by the respondent, in that it is a production of documents not proper under interrogatories under the admiralty rules and practice as to 6, 7, and 8, and that the matter inquired about is immaterial and irrelevant, not proper under the admiralty rules and practice, nor pertinent to the cause of action or the defense, as to the remaining exceptions.
Interrogatory 6: “Was a deck log of the Suneweo kept for the dates January 18 and *720January 19, 1928, and, if this question is answered in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The City of TauntonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- The Henry S. GroveDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
- The Princess SophiaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
- The CommonwealthDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jensen v. Sinclair Nav. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1931
- Curtis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
- The Coast Transit No. 2District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
- Green RibbonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934