The Henry S. Grove
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
CUSHMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon exceptions of libelant and intervening libelants to the interrogatories propounded by respondent and on the exceptions of intervening libel-ants to the answer of respondent.
The intervening libelants attempt to distinguish the contract for the sale of the Henry S. Grove from that before the court in the case of U. S. v. Carver (In re S. S. Clio and Morganza) 43 Sup. Ct. 181, 67 L. Ed. 214 (decided by the Supreme Court January 2, 1923), pointing out that, in the Carver Case, the contract denied to the buyer—
“the right, power or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The South CoastSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
- The South CoastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- The South CoastDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Certain Subfreights Due Steamship NeponsetDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
- Suspine v. Compania Transatlantica Centroamericana, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- The City of TauntonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Kane v. Motor Vessel LedaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.