Western Inv. Co. v. Mayberry

Counsel for plaintiff in error states the point he ,wishes reviewed in this case as follows:

“In all the assignments of errors presented to this conrt to pass npon there are only two questions for the court to consider: First. This action being one in replevin, and the plaintiff claiming right of possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage, it contended that the only proof necessary in order to entitle it to recover was that it held a good and valid mortgage conveying the property, and that a part of the indebtedness for which said mortgage was given to secure was past due and unpaid. Second.…