Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. of N.Y. v. Stinnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1920No. 9688PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. P. de Graffenried, Judge. Action by the city of Muskogee against Clay- Stinnett and the American Surety Company of New York. Judgment for plaintiff, and the Surety Company brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This action was commenced by the city of Muskogee, as plaintiff, against Olay Stinnett and the American Surety Company, to recover the sum of $4,169.69 upon the official bond of the said Clay Stin-nett.

The material portions of the plaintiff’s petition were: That on the 15th day of July, 1911, and prior thereto the defendant, Clay Stinnett, was acting as bookkeeper for the plaintiff, and as such handled moneys belonging to the plaintiff; that on said date he executed the bond sued on for the faithful performance of his duties; and the further provision of the bond was:

“And shall pay over all…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Mountain Park Stock Farm Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Montgomery v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
  3. St. Louis Mutual Life Insurance v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  4. North-western Mut. Life Ins. v. Fort's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
  5. Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. CannedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pine v. WebsterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. Lucky Strike Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. North British Merc. Co. v. Lucky Strike O. G. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API