Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Porter
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
Appellant appeals from a judgment ,in favor of appellee for the value of a horse killed upon its track. The action is based upon the statute in relation to fencing railroad tracks. Art. 4, ch. 38, E. S. 1881. The collision occurred near where the railroad crosses a public highway obliquely.
On the east side of the highway there is a cattle-pit, with wing fences leading up to it on either side.
The witnesses do not agree exactly, but the conclusion to be drawn from their statements is that the cattle-pit is about fifty feet east from the east line of the highway. On the north side of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Hayden v. SougerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- J., M. & I. R. R. v. LyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Evansville & Crawfordsville R. R. v. BarbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. HowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thames Loan & Trust Co. v. BevilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. HerboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. EtzlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.