Legal Opinion

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Thomas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1886No. 11,796PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Erom the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case the appellee Thomas sued the appellant railway company, in a complaint of three paragraphs. The object of the suit was to recover the value of a certain mare, owned and possessed by appellee, alleged to have been killed by a locomotive and train of cars owned, used and operated by appellant on the line of its railway, in Gibson county. In the first paragraph, appellee has stated his cause of action under the statute, which makes a railway company, whose tracks are not securely fenced in, liable in damages for all animals killed or injured by its engines or cars, used and operated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Indianapolis, Bloomington, & Western R. W. Co. v. McBrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Baltimore, Pittsburgh & Chicago R. W. Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. SwanTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. ZumbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. VanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Childers v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API