Legal Opinion

Freeman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 28, 2008No. 01-39LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion For Conditions, as well as Defendant’s Amended Response and Plaintiffs Reply. Plaintiff requests that this Court place conditions on the continued suspension of proceedings. Specifically, plaintiff asks that this Court order defendant to reimburse plaintiff $108,675.00, the amount plaintiff has allegedly paid in maintenance fees for the claims at issue in this case since this matter was remanded to the Department of Interior (“DOI”) in 2001, and to reimburse plaintiff for future maintenance fees until the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consolidation Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Chittenden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Reoforce, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API