Legal Opinion
J. R. Press Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided November 23, 1960No. 64924; protests 59/15856, 59/15861, and 59/18990 (Boston)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following memorandum accompanied the order granting the Government’s motion to dismiss:
Ford, Judge:
The protests listed in schedule ‘‘A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, are before us for determination of two motions, one a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the protests do not comply with the provisions of section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and the other a motion to amend said protests.
The protests were timely filed with the collector of customs at Boston, Mass., and read as follows:
*383[Protest 59/15856]. We wish to file a protest on the rate of Duty charged on the 200 Air…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atlantic Linen Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- How-Tex Peanut Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Shigoto International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Wieboldt International Div. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- C. M. Whitney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.