Barry v. Coughlin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
— Action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff was employed to work on a building of defendant Coughlin’s by the defendant Grace, who had contracted with defendant Coughlin to make certain repairs on said building. The defendants Coughlin, Galdón, and Galdón answered the plaintiff’s complaint by alleging that the claim and demand of the plaintiff has been fully paid and discharged. Defendant Grace does not answer.
The only issue raised by the pleadings is that of payment, and upon that issue the parties went to trial. The court found in favor of the defendants, and entered…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Bohn v. BohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Chapman v. GipsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Southern California Music Co. v. LabesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Kelsey v. San Fernando Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932