Legal Opinion

Southern California Music Co. v. Labes

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1930No. Docket No. 5924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GATES, J., pro tem.

This is an action for claim and delivery in which plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant the possession of one Schultz player piano, alleged to be of the value of $400, and for damages in the sum of $100 for the alleged unlawful detention thereof. Defendant in her answer denies that plaintiff is the owner of the personal property in controversy or is entitled to the possession thereof. She also denies that she wrongfully withholds the property, alleging that she is the owner of the same, having paid the full purchase price thereof. After hearing the evidence the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. National Union Fire Insurance v. NasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Great American Life Ins. Co. v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. People v. LevyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API